GI JI PHILOSOPHY · ILLUSTRATIVE MODEL

Independence, intelligence, privacy—and visible resource choices.

GI JI is a direction for products that keep people in control of their knowledge, make intelligent work inspectable and treat resource use as something to understand. The model below explores assumptions. It does not measure GI JI or prove that local AI is greener than cloud AI.

ONE DIRECTION, MORE THAN ONE APPLICATION

Five principles for the GI JI family.

These principles guide current work and possible future GI JI applications. They are not a promise that every application or capability already exists.

Independence

People should be able to keep their knowledge and normal AI workflow on computers and in folders they control, without making a remote service the permanent owner of their work.

Human-directed intelligence

AI can retrieve, compare and propose. A person remains responsible for meaning: inspecting evidence, correcting interpretation and deciding what becomes reusable knowledge.

Privacy

Local work is the default. When a connected service is useful, the boundary should be visible and the person should know what would leave before approving it.

Resource awareness

Model size, context, retries, network transfer and idle work are real design choices. They should be visible instead of disappearing behind a vague AI label.

Green AI as a direction

Environmental responsibility begins with measurement and honest uncertainty. It is a direction for GI JI products, not a badge or a claim that every local workflow is automatically greener.

FOUR POSSIBLE WORK PATHS

There is no universal winner.

The appropriate path depends on the task, computer, model, evidence and privacy boundary. The calculator compares four hypothetical mixes instead of declaring one architecture good.

Cloud AI only

Retrieval and generation may happen remotely. Local work is light, while network and data-centre work remain part of the path.

Local retrieval + connected model

Relevant evidence is selected locally before an approved request uses an online model. The remote generation still counts.

Local retrieval + local model

Search and generation run on the person's computer. The result depends strongly on the machine, model, runtime and workload.

Retrieval-only evidence

The workflow retrieves passages without generative answer writing. It uses less assumed model inference but provides less synthesis.

INTERACTIVE SCENARIO LAB

Change the assumptions. See how the scenario changes.

Every number below is an illustrative approximation calculated in this browser. It is not live product activity, telemetry, a carbon saving, or an environmental footprint for GI JI.

Scenario—not actual GI JI impactMethodology eco-scenario-1.0 · illustrative construction values
Scale and time
500K

Active people in this hypothetical scenario—not visitors, downloads, licences or actual GI JI users.

How requests are handled

Total: 100%

Organization scenario

Keep organization users included in the active-people number, or add them separately. This is still hypothetical adoption.

SCENARIO OUTPUT

Illustrative use-phase estimate

Estimated lower electricity in this scenario
Scenario peopleScenario
Knowledge requestsScenario
Scenario electricityScenario
Cloud-baseline electricityScenario
Difference from baselineScenario
Percentage differenceScenario
Network transferScenario
Evidence-supported resultsScenario assumption
Electricity per supported resultScenario assumption
Cloud AI only
Local retrieval + connected model
Local retrieval + local model
Retrieval-only evidence
Advanced: edit per-mode assumptions
Editable per-mode assumptions

These are illustrative starting values, not measurements or recommended settings. Change any value to test a different scenario. Broad input bounds prevent invalid or non-finite calculations.

Processing pathEnergy / 1,000 workflow requestsRetryCorrectionEvidence supportNetwork / request
Cloud AI only kWh % % % KB
Local retrieval + connected model kWh % % % KB
Local retrieval + local model kWh % % % KB
Retrieval-only evidence kWh % % % KB

Every result on this page is an illustrative scenario, not a measurement. Actual impact varies with hardware, model, query length, utilization, electricity mix, data-center efficiency, network conditions, and user behavior. This simulator uses illustrative assumptions, not measured GI JI values.

METHODOLOGY ECO-SCENARIO-1.0

The assumptions stay visible.

These modest construction values come from the existing Eco Impact specification. They exist to make the model work and can be replaced when comparable measurements exist. They are not measurements of GI JI, a named cloud provider or a customer.

FORMULA

Requests, overhead, then electricity.

People × daily requests × days creates the base volume. Each workflow share adds its illustrative retry and correction overhead before applying its assumed kWh per 1,000 workflow requests. Rounding happens only on screen.

UNKNOWN IN THIS VERSION

No carbon, water or lifecycle total.

Grid intensity, embodied hardware, model training, cooling, water, complete network infrastructure and hardware replacement are not calculated. No invented value replaces missing evidence.

PRIVACY

The controls stay in this browser.

The scenario script makes no network request and stores no inputs. Loading the page still creates the ordinary web-server access record described in the privacy notice.

MEASURE BEFORE CLAIMING

Green AI is a direction, not a score.

A useful environmental claim would need comparable workloads, measured system energy, named hardware and models, uncertainty and a clear lifecycle boundary. Until that exists, GI JI can publish its philosophy, assumptions and unknowns—and keep improving the questions it asks.